Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09620 12
Original file (09620 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

Rye EG: AOS DSTTITY

ELD SLL Am a AN ae ile alee oe

701 $, COURTHOUSE ROAD
ARLINGTON, VA 22204

 

JBH

Docket No. 9620-12
27 August 2013

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

26 August 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
jn accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUMED Letter 1000 Ser
M1/13UM10024 dated 20 February 2013, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board

reconsider its decision upon submission of new and Material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,
Ly rome leet
W. DEAN P
Executive Director

Fnelosure: BUMED Letter 1000 Ser M1L/13UM10024 dated 209 Feb 2013

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11217 14

    Original file (NR11217 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NR11217-14 1 May 15 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUMED letter 1000 Ser M1/15UM10016 dated 25 February 2015, a copy of which is attached. NR11217-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7695 14

    Original file (NR7695 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR7695-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3857 14

    Original file (NR3857 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Boar@ for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0879 14

    Original file (NR0879 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NROO879-14 21 July 2614 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Documentary material considered by *he Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0080 14

    Original file (NR0080 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NROOO8O-14 7 July 2014 in reference to your recent Application for Correction A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03742-06

    Original file (03742-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUt4ED letter 7220 Ser Ml/O5UMl-50l8 of 10 January 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4153 13

    Original file (NR4153 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In essence, the Board felt you received payments for an obligation you did not fulfill and the Navy's action to make you repay the payments did not equate to material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02187-08

    Original file (02187-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There was not noted to be too much response to the ECTs for the first five treatments, however, following that the patient began to improve markedly. In that anniversary year you were credited with 48 of the 50 retirement points needed for a qualifying year of service. Sincerely, Nadu W. DEAN PFEJURF Executive Dil r DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY (MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS) 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-1000 May 5, 2008 This correspondence is in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01056-11

    Original file (01056-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 August 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05319-11

    Original file (05319-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...